Commenting is deactivated.
Please post all new topics and queries to the
Discussion Forum
by J.Lim
(Sydney, NSW)
Dear Peter
A second question from me. And I apologise for my awful camera skills.
Yesterday I bought a vase at an auction. The auction did not make any representations about the age of the vase at all, but I bought it anyway as I really like the paintwork. I assumed it was new because, as you see, the body is somewhat even in texture (although not dead shiny).
Newness indications on body:
-very even flat glaze, with a greyish cast and satiny texture but quite flat
- no rust spots or voids apart from one large dint near the bottom with a rust coloured interior
- very even cobalt with few bubbles or unevenness - no heap-and-piling
However, on inverting the vase I see the unmistakable signs of age. The mark is the empty double ring, which might indicate Kangxi or a later replica. I note the following signs of age (the photo is awful I know):
- the same satiny, greyish glaze as the body, fairly lumpy like the "mutton fat" effect
- crackles near the foot, some with rusty colour in them
- two mid sized rust spots and a couple of tiny ones
- several dints and voids in the glaze
I have several genuine 18th century pieces and these age signs look similar.
Maybe this is a 19th century replica of a Kangxi? (I doubt this is actual 18th century since the blue is so even). Or maybe this is an old base with a new body attached?
I have stared my eyes out and can see NO signs of a seam or other indication that the base was originally separate. Yet how can the one look old while the other is so smooth??
Thanks for your help!
Regards
J.Lim
Comments for Old base and new body? My Kangxi vase and age
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||