Commenting is deactivated.
Please post all new topics and queries to the
Discussion Forum
by Brett
(Charlotte, North Carolina, USA)
Following up on my posting from yesterday...I've added some photos of the piece in natural light. Perhaps that will help zero in the authentification and identification.
You state that it is a bowl from the late Qing dynasty. Is that good? Is it an usual version from this time period that should be considered an investment quality piece? Or, is it something common that I could just serve potato chips out of at the holiday party...merely a conversation starter? Thanks very much for your assistance.
Comments for Follow up...authentic chinese antique?
|
||
|
||